RA Student Shoots Congresswoman, Kills Fed Judge

[ham]

Lefty medias are already bellowing...

This nut Loughner is a radical leftist pot smoking musician. He apparently did himself a little drain bramage somewhere along the line by consuming too much alcohol (alcohol poisoning). He has a couple of drug arrests, and got rejected by the Army for failing the drug test.

He read "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" and thought it sounded like fun. He couldn't find Nurse Ratched to strangle so he took a run at the biggest female around, his local congressladyperson. Knowing he was too big a wuss to actually throttle her bare-handed, he had to use a gun. And he had that taken away from him by a 61-year lady, and then got body slammed by a 74-year old man.

He took a cab to the murder scene! Not driving one, like Travis Bickle, but as a fare.

This sounds more like Keith Olbermann than anybody I ever saw at a tea party. How anyone can tie this mental midget Loughner to conservatives or conservatism is beyond me. He's about the exact opposite of everything conservatives stand for. On the other hand, add "PhD" after his name and he could get a job at nearly every RA college in the country.

Go figure...
as soon as it happened, here a newspaper quoted "well-informed intelligence sources" that ascribed this "tide of hate crimes" to "racist and paramilitary" underground syndicates, with a pic of Nazis marching (taken in 1938 I guess...).
Schopenhauer wrote:

Stratagem XXXII
If you are confronted with an assertion, there is a short way of getting rid of it, or, at any rate, of throwing
suspicion on it, by putting it into some odious category; even though the connection is only apparent, or else
of a loose character. You can say, for instance,
“That is Manichaeism” or “It is Arianism,” or “Pelagianism,” or
“Idealism,” or “Spinozism,” or “Pantheism,” or “Brownianism,” or
“Naturalism,” or “Atheism,” or “Rationalism,” “Spiritualism,”
“Mysticism,” and so on.
In making an objection of this kind, you take it for granted (1) that the assertion in question is identical with,
or is at least contained in, the category cited—that is to say, you cry out, “Oh, I have heard that before”; and
(2) that the system referred to has been entirely refuted, and does not contain a word of truth.

Bandwagon appeal...
They call every dissident a Nazi without the slightest clue what they are talking about...anti-immigrationist, religious fundamentalist of various persuasions, racialist, survivalist, right-wing libertarian...