Porn Kills Again
#1
Will we ever know how many rapes and murders have been inspired by pervert Thomas "Chip" White and his pedophile-pandering pornography enterprises?

If, as stated in the article, the porn industry is directly responsible for the increase in sexual violence against children, shouldn't Degreeinfo.com's Thomas "Chip" White also be held directly responsible?

Aren't the people who post and moderate at Degreeinfo.com also responsible for contributing to harming children?

Quote:posted on October 27, 2012
Pornography Kills Again

By David Outten

The body of 10-year-old Jessica Ridgeway of Colorado was found dismembered October 10. On October 23, [17-year old] Austin Sigg’s mother turned him over to the police as the killer. Sigg had been receiving treatment over the last two years for a pornography addiction.

The case of Jessica Ridgeway is far from unusual. In 2009, there were 65,964 cases of child sexual abuse reported in the United States.

German research found that 60 percent of men and 10 percent of women watch porn at least weekly (most daily). A study by IconKids & Youth found that 30 percent of girls and boys see porn before the age of 11. By age 17, 93 percent of boys and 80 percent of girls have seen porn.

Therapist Tabea Fretag, a specialist in media addition issues, says, “I have treated several traumatized women who were sexually abused by brothers who had been watching a lot of porn, among them many women who came from homes where the parenting was good.” She recounts one story where a mother found 30 porn site addresses listed in her computer’s browser, including one about horror sex. Her 9-year-old son had been logging on to the sites when she was out shopping. She and her husband tried to deal with it empathetically but later found him sexually abusing his little sister.

The danger is not just a few corrupted boys. A 1989 study of undergraduate males by John Briere and M. Runtz found that 21 percent reported some sexual attraction to small children and nine percent had fantasized about having sex with them. A study by 2004 Study by Michael C. Seto found that of 100 men convicted for child pornography offenses, 43 had also been charged with actual sex offenses.

According to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Report, 32 million American women and 13 million American men have received unwanted sexual contact. Of these, 21 million women and 1.5 million men have been raped. Girls under 10 years old account for 12.3 percent, or 2.6 million, rapes. The report concludes:

“The promotion of respectful, nonviolent relationships is not just the responsibility of individuals and partners, but also of the communities and society in which they live. It is important to continue addressing the beliefs, attitudes and messages that are deeply embedded in our social structures and that create a social climate that condones sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence.”

While the politically-correct CDC study was unwilling to mention pornography, it’s obvious to any sensible human being that pornography not only condones sexual violence, it promotes it. It drives boys like Austin Sigg to become killers capable of dismembering another human being. While the number of children dismembered may be small, 2.6 million rapes of girls under 10-years-old is not a small number! ...

Quote:Did Pornography Contribute to Jessica Ridgeway's Murder?
1:09PM EDT 10/26/2012 Charisma News Staff

Reports this week indicate that the accused killer of 10-year-old Jessica Ridgeway of Colorado, who disappeared on Oct. 5 and whose dismembered body was found several days later, was a [17-year old] boy who was addicted to pornography.

“News that the boy accused of killing Jessica Ridgeway is addicted to pornography will come as no surprise to law enforcement agents with experience in sexual crimes,” says Patrick A. Trueman, president of Morality in Media and former chief of the U. S. Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section in Washington, D.C.

“Pornography consumption causes addiction and leads many, children included, to sexual violence. It’s high time the U.S. government took the issue of pornography seriously again and began vigorously prosecuting the major producers and distributors of hardcore pornography.”

The connection between pornography and sexual violence among minors has been clearly established. Several peer-reviewed studies regarding this link are available on PornHarmsResearch.com.

The mother of the boy accused of this monstrous crime called police to say that her son, 17-year-old Austin Sigg, may have been the killer. News reports indicate that he has been treated for pornography addiction since he was just 15, so the question must be asked: Did pornography contribute to Jessica Ridgeway’s killing?

Sigg is the main suspect in another violent crime, an attempted rape on an adult jogger. “We do not know and may never know exactly how much influence pornography played in these two crimes, but sexual crimes by minors do not happen in a vacuum; porn is almost always a significant contributing factor,” Trueman said.

“When the U.S. Department of Justice gave up enforcing federal pornography laws, it gave up on our children. Now addiction, sexual experimentation mirroring scenes from violent porn videos, as well as sexual violence are all too common among children. Child-on-child sexual crimes, once unheard of, are also on the rise,” says Trueman.

The porn industry is directly responsible for these trends and the harm to our nation’s children. But law enforcement officials, such as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who refuse to enforce anti-pornography laws, designed to protect children and society from sexual predators, bear much responsibility also,” he continued.

Eric Holder is the first U.S. Attorney General in nearly 30 years to refuse to enforce federal pornography laws, which were passed by Congress over many years by wide bi-partisan margins. Federal laws prohibit distribution of obscene (hardcore) adult pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV, in retail shops and by common carrier, such as UPS.

[Image: 20121024__Austin-Reed-Sigg~p1_200.jpg][Image: mysteryman.jpg]
Porn addicted murderer...............Porn producer
Austin Sigg..............................Thomas "Chip" White
Reply
#2
PFFT!
The same special interest crap from the 1970s...pornography makes you a murderer...what's next? Being a homosexual? Voting for the 'wrong' candidate? Isn't pornography everywhere, like those ads peddling a watch or window treatment brand with more or less copious amounts of nudity?
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#3
(10-28-2012, 04:14 PM)ham Wrote: PFFT!

You can PFFT all you want, but the studies cited (PornHarmsResearch.com) are valid academic works (i.e., not some "global warming" type BS). If you're going to PFFT, how about some studies or other tangible evidence that support it?
Reply
#4
Have you ever peeked at some scantily clad, preferably young and beautiful, woman? It must be never ever, otherwise I can tell you you are a potential rapist, wife-beater and abuser. G-d forbid if the young and pretty woman was significantly younger than yourself...was she a minor, perhaps? Oy vey! So she wasn't a minor after all (how could you be sure)...another nasty potential pedophile stalking our cradles...so ok, you are sure she was nineteen and that's perfectly legal...still, some may still smell the potential pedophile rat...didn't you realize women aren't objects, you sexist bigot? The buzz word is potential here...we ALL are potentially everything...before we ever know, we can have a beer, go out and kill three innocent people at the wheel...that's called drunk driving...oh yea...i hear you say you only had a small beer and didn't really see them crossing in the dark...another murderous maniac splitting hairs to save his butt...have you ever criticized -even mildly- middle eastern policies? Can you guess what's the rat I can smell HERE? Have you ever said uncomplimentary things about Blacks, gays, Asians, Hispanics, the disabled, mormons, etc etc? Which rat can I smell here?
Besides, the bible itself contains several sexual suggestions...should you bin it, then? Oh, no...that's an historical legacy...PFFT! I can tell you that ten negroes getting frisky with five chinese women is photographic art, much as they argued about the underage Brooke Shields nudes...see?
The same psychologizing apparatus that was used to demonize Germans during WWI was used to demonize Jews, then Germans once again, then Communists...then you and me...
I don't need to continue to make my point, need I?
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#5
(10-29-2012, 08:28 PM)ham Wrote: ...we ALL are potentially everything...

Speak for yourself, ham. I've never had the urge to rape, murder and dismember a 10-year old, no matter how many beers I've had.
Reply
#6
(10-30-2012, 12:29 AM)WilliamW Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 08:28 PM)ham Wrote: ...we ALL are potentially everything...

Speak for yourself, ham. I've never had the urge to rape, murder and dismember a 10-year old, no matter how many beers I've had.

Quod erat demonstrandum

[Image: hulk-hogan-pro-wrestler.jpg]
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#7
Is Ham angling for a job with the next Obama administration? Might be a long wait. Big Grin Plus he'd have to cut in line to get ahead of pedophile-pandering perverts like Thomas "Chip" White.

Quote:Obama’s HHS ‘Grooming’ Children for Sex
Matt Barber
Oct 29, 2012

(Warning: The following contains disturbing information of a sexual nature.)

My strength is as the strength of ten, because my heart is pure. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

My dear friend and colleague Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor at Liberty University School of Law, recently guest lectured during “Sexual Behavior and the Law,” a course I teach. Dr. Reisman’s lecture was filmed by CSPAN and will be airing soon.

In past years, Dr. Reisman has served as scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). She is a world renowned expert on the discredited research of bug doctor turned “sexologist,” Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey, though married to a woman who took part in his many filmed “scientific” orgies, was a promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed to completely upend and twist the world’s perception of human sexuality in the 1950s and ’60s with his world famous “Kinsey Reports.”

Even today, most are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants – all in the name of science.

Among other things, Kinsey asserted that children are “sexual from birth.” He further concluded, based upon experiments he directed and documented in his infamous Table 34, that adult-child sex is harmless, even beneficial, and described child “orgasm” as “culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting. …” Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and [would] scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from the [adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.”

Yeah. Sounds like it.

It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman identifies Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath.” These children were as young as 2 months old.

Disturbing though that may be, what’s equally disturbing is that nearly all of today’s liberal “comprehensive sex education” curricula – such as that pushed by groups like the National Education Association (NEA), Planned Parenthood and the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) – is derived entirely from the criminally fraudulent research of Alfred Kinsey.

But even more troubling is a recent discovery by Dr. Reisman. She found that the Obama administration, which fully embraces the debunked Kinsey sex-education model, has begun pushing a curriculum that, in many ways, eerily mirrors the “FBI Molester Grooming Paradigm.”

In short, she found that both Obama’s HHS and many public sex-education programs are doing to children, constructively, what pedophiles do to “groom” them for sex:

According to the FBI, child molesters:
Demonstrate sex acts to children. Offenders commonly use pornography to teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.
Lower the sexual inhibitions of children. Some children naturally fear sexual activities. Some offenders show pictures of other children engaging in sexual activities to overcome these fears, indicating to their intended victims that it is all right to have sex with an adult because lots of other boys and girls do the same thing.
Desensitize children to sex. Offenders commonly show child pornography to their intended victims to expose them to sexual acts before they are naturally curious about such activities.
Sexually arouse children. Offenders commonly use pornographic images of other children to arouse victims, particularly those in adolescence.

During her lecture, Dr. Reisman shocked the 50-plus in attendance by illustrating that today’s Kinseyan-based sex education – as promoted by Obama’s HHS – does much of what the FBI describes above.

Graphic sexual images and explicit “values neutral” talk of sex and sexuality are rampant throughout classrooms across America, effectively desensitizing children and numbing their natural inhibitions. These inhibitions help protect children from potential predators.

According to Dr. Reisman, “the brain data fully support [the] finding” that such “sex education” literally changes the neural pathways of a child’s brain. There is mounting scientific evidence to support this hypothesis.

Whatever its motive, the Obama administration is guilty of employing these grooming techniques on children.

Consider, for instance, that just last year, the Department of Health and Human Services’ “Questions and Answers About Sex” website provided a “Quick Guide to Healthy Living” section which, like Kinsey, outrageously claimed that “Children are human beings and therefore sexual beings … which is healthy and normal.”

Get the implication? And what do “sexual beings” do? Well, they have sex, of course. “It’s hard for parents to acknowledge this,” admitted the page.

You think?

The HHS link then suggested that youth “may also experiment with sexual experiences, including those with members of the same sex, during the years they are exploring their own sexuality.”

Sound familiar? Remember, the FBI indicates that pedophiles will “teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.”

Who needs pedophiles when we have today’s “comprehensive sex education”? It does all that and more.

Speaking of masturbation and other “sort of ‘sexual’ behavior … young kids exhibit,” the HHS is right there to help. The link says “Parents should only be concerned about masturbation if a child seems preoccupied with it to the exclusion of other activities.”

Otherwise, masturbate away, I guess.

Today’s Kinseyan “comprehensive sex education” model, embraced by Barack Obama and other “progressives,” is nothing short of educational malpractice. It’s child corruption. It’s criminally reckless. It’s undeniably “grooming” children for sex.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, a then-Sen. Barack Obama spoke about teaching “comprehensive sex education” to kindergartners: “It’s the right thing to do … to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools,” he said.

And by “science-based,” of course, he meant “Kinsey-based.”

So, what is age appropriate, science-based sex education? Well, we know what Alfred Kinsey thought was “age appropriate.” We know what he considered “science-based.”

I’d expect such “educational” grooming tactics and opinions from Alfred Kinsey or Jerry Sandusky, but not from public educators – not from the U.S. government.

And most certainly, not from the president of the United States.
Reply
#8
and guess where all those "psychologists" came from? Right from the war propaganda department demonstrating with colorful " scientific" charts how Germans and Japanese were "mentally ill"...now you want them to go away but they won't...what a pity, eh? Oh, yes, some of them might have had a chip on their shoulder, or two or three...who did you expect would act as your war propaganda clowns and full-time cheerleaders, St. Francis of Assisi? It seems that the neighbor you might most like would look more like one of those awful 1930s Germans or Japanese than anything else...what a irony, eh? You made your bed, now sleep in it.
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#9
Quote:Is Ham angling for a job with the next Obama administration? Might be a long wait. Big Grin Plus he'd have to cut in line to get ahead of pedophile-pandering perverts like Thomas "Chip" White.

I got a ten-year platinum subscription to Boyf-nk...then Chip was so gracious he threw in another one year subscription to gayn-tz . Of course, I complained I had no way to know where he would be in less than ten years, so he felt my pain and threw in ONE BACHELOR DEGREE, APCU-accredited...
Envious?
You'd better be...
All that 1950s styled crap about porn...didn't you read Freud? We're all faggots deep down...Big GrinCoolRolleyes
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#10
(10-30-2012, 03:58 PM)ham Wrote: Oh, yes, some of them might have had a chip on their shoulder, or two or three...

I doubt that "shoulder" would be the body part that would attract Chip.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)