05-20-2008, 02:02 AM
When you discover your minister has an "offshore diploma mill" degree on his wall and insists on being called "Rev. Dr.," should you:
a) stalk him
b) out him
c) report him to the feds
d) all of the above?
In Canada, where common sense and civility prevail, the answer seems to be "none of the above."
a) stalk him
b) out him
c) report him to the feds
d) all of the above?
In Canada, where common sense and civility prevail, the answer seems to be "none of the above."
Quote:Faux diploma is vain, but not fraudhttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/426681
May 17, 2008 04:30 AM
Ken Gallinger
Q The senior minister in our church is doing a good job, and is well liked both in the congregation and in the community, where he contributes to many worthwhile charitable projects. However, he insists on being called Rev. Dr., and on his wall is a PhD certificate that is fake – that is, from on offshore degree mill. I have broached the topic with him gently but he becomes offended and even a shade derogatory. Should I pursue this matter any further with the board of our church?
A Once upon a time, I proudly displayed my university diplomas on my office wall. Sadly, my office was directly beneath a washroom used by a daycare centre. One day, the little Heaven's Angels decided it would be fun to stuff approximately 432 rolls of toilet paper in the loo directly above my proud parchments. By the time the flood subsided, my hard-earned pieces of paper had returned to the pulp from which they came.
Strangely, I have discovered that, since becoming diploma-less, I am not one whit more or less competent, compassionate or employable than I was before the deluge. This experience has taught me exactly how much a diploma, per se, is worth.
The issue with your pastor's mail-order diploma is not one of credentials. I know of no church where a PhD is required for pastoral ministry, so it's not like a medical doctor displaying a fake MD or an engineer wearing a dime-store ring. Your minister, by your own admission, is doing a good job, which only proves the point.
There is an issue, however, of honesty. And, unlike a doctorate, honesty is essential in the relationship between spiritual leaders and their flock. Even here, though, his indiscretion is a minor one – not an outright lie, just a bending of the truth. If the diploma were a forgery from a real university like Queen's, Western or U of T, then you'd be talking about fraud and would be fully justified in pushing the point further.
But the piece of paper is what it is – it admits to where it's from, and anyone reading it can make their own judgment – just as you have.
As for insisting on being called Rev. Dr. – well, that's pompous, regardless of whether the degree is real or fake, and if pomposity were a prosecutable offence, half the ministers I know would be in jail.
What you're dealing with here is a foolish but minor image enhancement – nothing more or less. Why your minister needs such an ego boost is up to him to sort out. I know ministers who dye their hair to look younger (thank goodness I don't know any who colour their beards). I know ministers who wear coloured contact lenses to look sexier. I know ministers who preach with fake Scottish accents to sound more erudite. Big deal.
You've raised the issue. You've made your point. Let it go. It's the good "doctor's" problem, not yours.
Send your questions to Ken Gallinger at ethical@sympatico.ca