Obama = President Pantywaist
#1
Our friends in the UK have the perspective that many people in the US lack.  God save Gerald Warner:

Barack Obama: President Pantywaist - new surrender monkey on the block
Quote:Posted By: Gerald Warner at Apr 10, 2009 at 10:20:05

President Barack Obama has recently completed the most successful foreign policy tour since Napoleon's retreat from Moscow. You name it, he blew it. What was his big deal economic programme that he was determined to drive through the G20 summit? Another massive stimulus package, globally funded and co-ordinated. Did he achieve it? Not so as you'd notice.

Barack is not the first New World ingenue to discover that European leaders will load him with praise, struggle sycophantically to be photographed with him and outdo him in Utopian rhetoric. But when it comes to the critical moment of opening their wallets - suddenly it is flag-day in Aberdeen. Okay, put the G20 down to inexperience, beginner's nerves, what you will.

On to Nato and the next big objective: to persuade the same European evasion experts that America, Britain and Canada should no longer bear the brunt of the Afghan struggle virtually unassisted. The Old World sucked through its teeth, said that was asking a lot - but, seeing it was Barack, to whom they could refuse nothing, they would graciously accede to his wishes.

So The One retired triumphant, having secured a massive contribution of 5,000 extra troops - all of them non-combatant, of course - which must really have put the wind up the Taliban, at the prospect of 5,000 more infidel cooks and bottle-washers swarming into the less hazardous regions of Afghanistan.

Then came the dramatic bit, the authentic West Wing script, with the President wakened in the middle of the night in Prague to be told that Kim Jong-il had just launched a Taepodong-2 missile. America had Aegis destroyers tracking the missile and could have shot it down. But Uncle Sam had a sterner reprisal in store for l'il ole Kim (as Dame Edna might call him): a multi-megaton strike of Obama hot air.

"Rules must be binding," declared Obama, referring to the fact that Kim had just breached UN Resolutions 1695 and 1718. "Violations must be punished." (Sounds ominous.) "Words must mean something." (Why, Barack? They never did before, for you - as a cursory glance at your many speeches will show.)

President Pantywaist is hopping mad and he has a strategy to cut Kim down to size: he is going to slice $1.4bn off America's missile defence programme, presumably on the calculation that Kim would feel it unsporting to hit a sitting duck, so that will spoil his fun.

Watch out, France and Co, there is a new surrender monkey on the block and, over the next four years, he will spectacularly sell out the interests of the West with every kind of liberal-delusionist initiative on nuclear disarmament and sitting down to negotiate with any power freak who wants to buy time to get a good ICBM fix on San Francisco, or wherever. If you thought the world was a tad unsafe with Dubya around, just wait until President Pantywaist gets into his stride.

Barack Obama and the CIA: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?
Quote:Posted By: Gerald Warner at Apr 24, 2009 at 18:41:00

If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter.

Obama's problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail.

That is why he opened Pandora's Box by publishing the Justice Department's legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralised CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda.

"Don't be discouraged by what's happened the last few weeks," he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them - or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed.

So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers.

Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that - once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension.

President Pantywaist Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya's administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11.

President Pantywaist's recent world tour, cosying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America's enemies. Here, they realised, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?
Reply
#2
Who is this idiot Gerald Warner?
Another living room Rambo and armchair Hercules who watched too many Chuck Norris re-runs from the 1980s?

Quote:On to Nato and the next big objective: to persuade the same European evasion experts that America, Britain and Canada should no longer bear the brunt of the Afghan struggle virtually unassisted.

It is THEIR war...they are profiting from opium and oil. Who ran away from Iraq with boxes packed with money? Certainly not Poles or Italians or some other third-rate scum 'proud ally'...

Quote:A BBC investigation estimates that around $23bn (£11.75bn) may have been lost, stolen or just not properly accounted for in Iraq.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7444083.stm

Oh, I forgot they are 'doing it for us'...
PFFT!
Everybody knows which artworks Nazi hoodlums had ransacked during their European tour...did your local TV or press say anything about the plundering of Iraq?

Boy, do I hate those 'conservatives'...UK in 1939 was THE world superpower...their 'disinterested crusade for someone else's freedom' demoted it by 1944 to the rank to a mere regional power...what do they want, being demoted to Sierra Leone's level?
PFFT!

Quote:So The One retired triumphant, having secured a massive contribution of 5,000 extra troops - all of them non-combatant, of course - which must really have put the wind up the Taliban, at the prospect of 5,000 more infidel cooks and bottle-washers swarming into the less hazardous regions of Afghanistan.

Are there billions to steal, too?

Quote:"Rules must be binding," declared Obama, referring to the fact that Kim had just breached UN Resolutions 1695 and 1718. "Violations must be punished." (Sounds ominous.) "Words must mean something." (Why, Barack? They never did before, for you - as a cursory glance at your many speeches will show.)

Ok, nuke Iran...nuke North Korea...but before, nuke Israel that has been dodging, ignoring and laughing at U.N resolutions for decades...well, although logic, this last phrase may not register well with mr. conservative's editors and employers...who knows why, eh?

Quote:liberal-delusionist initiative on nuclear disarmament and sitting down to negotiate with any power freak who wants to buy time to get a good ICBM fix on San Francisco, or wherever.

Sure, with all those weapons of mass destruction your henchmen found in Iraq, eh mr. conservative? Or were your friends busy plundering Iraq's wealth and handing out contracts to your supporters to bother with what might one day happen to San Francisco?
Hey! CIA could sell them a suitable missile...after all, they've been equipping murderous religious extremist for decades! Hey! Britain stirred Arab nationalism first during WWI to annoy the Turks...why is Arab nationalism now bad, mr. conservative?
Hey, mr. conservative...why did you lie to me saying all those illegal  Muslim aliens were a godsend for western economies and only Nazis full of hate could not see they'd make us richer than we've ever been? Why do you want to nuke them now?

Quote:So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb.

Hey armchair Rambo, why don't you reopen those famous gas chambers everybody talks hysterically about all the time? Nevermind 'hate crimes'...those are for the 17yo skinhead caught with three copies of Mein Leben...he'll go to jail...

The worst part is that idiot gets money to write this tripe...


PFFT!
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#3
WMD - who really knew? Hussein's lack of cooperation with inspectors cost him his job and his life. They had gutted and nutted the CIA so there was little reliable information to go on.


Acting like a sissy girl on the world stage will simply show the enemies that America is weak and uncommitted. Obama is a good president to oversee a surrender, not fight a war.
Reply
#4
Quote:WMD - who really knew? Hussein's lack of cooperation with inspectors cost him his job and his life. They had gutted and nutted the CIA so there was little reliable information to go on.

Oh really?
When the hoax was pimped, it was guaranteed 100% accurate, no if, no but. There was even a pathetic Italian angle: some fugitive African diplomat had sworn that his country had sold sensitive materials to Iraq and that the doomsday weapons WERE there...
PFFT!
Now you say that with crooked CIA you never know...maybe they got paid to lie...when, exactly? Or maybe they just screwed up...they're used to it, eh?

There was also another funny angle: Russia (with China, Germany and France at the time ) had helped Iraq get rid of damning evidence just in time...

Will any 'proud American' care to comment about the allegations of plunder?
Oh, I am so sure it is a hoax peddled by antinationals...
The fact that Cheney showered his supporters with Iraq contracts was all over the press, but nevermind...right or wrong, it's your country, eh?

And all that crock of sh-t about Taliban satellites...wake up! All any terrorist has to do to destroy America (or any other western country) is to poison water supplies...cost? Maybe 5 dollars? Forget sci-fi crap about Muslim Darth Vaders walking on water...
Or are we saying that our water supplies are so top secret that no terrorist stuffed with oil billions we fund every time we shop for fuel can buy access to them?
And of course our 'great leaders' won't do anything to curb oil consumption with alternatives...free market, eh? Loons talk about megatons and torture but THAT is asking too much, eh?
PFFT!
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  US President Obama enacts student loan forgiveness Virtual Bison 2 15,898 07-02-2014, 06:09 AM
Last Post: Virtual Bison
  Who do you support for US President? Virtual Bison 18 80,857 01-27-2012, 05:07 PM
Last Post: Virtual Bison
  French President's fake credentials? ham 4 23,121 03-07-2009, 05:59 PM
Last Post: ham

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)