A BIG OPPORTUNITY FOR DOOGLEARSE
#41
dooglearse Wrote:
BROWN TEAL Wrote:
dooglearse Wrote:But I'm happy to leave things where they are.

I'm happy to accept your apology.

Which you will most certainly never receive.

Apart from yourself nobody here will be surprised with your reply!
Reply
#42
dooglearse Wrote:Which you will most certainly never receive.

Considering RCD's blind obsession with RA or NO WAY I'm reminded on his mate's memorable comment:

"Many job descriptions specify that a certain degree is required, or that additional salary will be paid, if a certain degree is held. In many of these situations, a good unaccredited degree will suffice."

I also have most of JB's "Guides", all of which promoted the value of 'unaccredited' degrees - the value of which was in fact endorsed by RCD's 'research'!
Reply
#43
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Considering RCD's blind obsession with RA or NO WAY I'm reminded on his mate's memorable comment:

"Many job descriptions specify that a certain degree is required, or that additional salary will be paid, if a certain degree is held. In many of these situations, a good unaccredited degree will suffice."

I also have most of JB's "Guides", all of which promoted the value of 'unaccredited' degrees - the value of which was in fact endorsed by RCD's 'research'!

Hates on Bear whenever possible; quotes him when it suits his needs. Amazing.

Of course, not being a real researcher--just an owner of two fake doctorates--he doesn't understand that these things change with the times. Since Bear wrote those things a plethora of accredited DL programs have arisen--negating the need to pursue degrees from unaccredited schools. Unless one wishes to commit academic fraud, of course. Right?Cool

Tick...tick...tick...tick...best to leave it alone, eh?
Reply
#44
dooglearse Wrote:Hates on Bear whenever possible; quotes him when it suits his needs. Amazing.
Of course, not being a real researcher--just an owner of two fake doctorates--he doesn't understand that these things change with the times. Since Bear wrote those things a plethora of accredited DL programs have arisen--negating the need to pursue degrees from unaccredited schools. Unless one wishes to commit academic fraud, of course. Right?Cool Tick...tick...tick...tick...best to leave it alone, eh?

After JB 'encouraged' me to enrol with TCU he strongly recommended that if I needed a 'real' degree I should look at FAIRFAX, GREENWICH, KENNEDY WESTERN, etc.
And whilst talking about research perhaps, instead of raving on about academic fraud, you could provide a list of you published works?
Reply
#45
BROWN TEAL Wrote:And whilst talking about research perhaps, instead of raving on about academic fraud, you could provide a list of you published works?

Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.
Reply
#46
dooglearse Wrote:
BROWN TEAL Wrote:And whilst talking about research perhaps, instead of raving on about academic fraud, you could provide a list of you published works?

Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.

Which in simply terms means that you have never published anything!
You have also lost track of the subject - which was about you applying for a section in Who's Who, so that you can become a somebody instead of a nobody.
Reply
#47
BROWN TEAL Wrote:
dooglearse Wrote:
BROWN TEAL Wrote:And whilst talking about research perhaps, instead of raving on about academic fraud, you could provide a list of you published works?

Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.

Which in simply terms means that you have never published anything!
You have also lost track of the subject - which was about you applying for a section in Who's Who, so that you can become a somebody instead of a nobody.

Not true. Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.
Reply
#48
dooglearse Wrote:
BROWN TEAL Wrote:
dooglearse Wrote:
BROWN TEAL Wrote:And whilst talking about research perhaps, instead of raving on about academic fraud, you could provide a list of you published works?
Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.
Which in simply terms means that you have never published anything!
You have also lost track of the subject - which was about you applying for a section in Who's Who, so that you can become a somebody instead of a nobody.

Not true. Changing the subject doesn't change the facts.

You are very reminiscent of a stuck LP record.
Reply
#49
BROWN TEAL Wrote:You are very reminiscent of a stuck LP record.

Thank you for that anachronism.
Reply
#50
"Dr" Duck and "Dr" Doogle, what exactly are you trying to prove and to whom by this endless silly exchange?

"Dr" Duck, everyone knows you've done some worthwhile research on that bird for which you have received international recognition. Everyone also knows that you possess a couple of totally worthless doctorates. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real doctor.

"Dr" Doogle, everyone knows how you got your "doctorate" from that bottom tier school. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real scholar. I can hear you saying, "but my degree is RA". Well, that wouldn't make any difference in academic circles or to people who know anything about real Ph.D. degrees. All you did to get your "Ph.D." was a survey of the acceptance of accredited and unaccredited degrees by employers. That's hardly the standard of accepted Ph.D. research work. What will be next, a Ph.D. in biscuit cutting?

Give it up guys, you can't convince anyone here. You can't convince yourselves either. You can use your "doctorates" to impress your neighbors and your friends and relatives who cannot tell the difference between Knightbridge and Harvard, or between a real Ph.D. research and a survey.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)