05-28-2008, 02:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2008, 03:01 AM by True Patriot.)
Hello Forum Members,
I would like to mount a compaign against supposed distance learning experts and forums that allow individuals to post negative information that embarasses, defames or insults people because of the university they attended. You may contact me at RobertHill20@yahoo.com.
Freedom of Speech does not give someone the right to malign the character of another individual. We must make a stand now, or eventually, we will lose the right to decide. I believe that eventually there will be a test case in either Oregon, Maine, Texas, Washington State or any other for that matter which will overturn the laws created to prevent someone from using their unaccredited degree.
I wish to point out here that I don't condone the purchase or sale of a transcript or degree purely for the exchange of financial consideration. Work should be required. Evaluation of experiential learning is a hot topic for many people, and as long as the institution is legitimately licensed, no one should have the right to say anything.
Accreditation has always been a voluntary process. Please click on the Google link listed below and read many of the states from government websites, both state and federal. I believe with passing of the Higher Education Act of 1965, accreditation became emphasized as a means to insure quality in education.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=na...+education
http://www.chea.org/pdf/CHEA%20At%20A%20...-10-03.pdf
"CHEA Purposes ____________________________________________________________
Advocacy
• Primary national voice for voluntary accreditation"
In 1985, I borrowed close to $6,000.00 from the Federal Student Loan Program for the purpose of attending Clayton University, formally of Missouri, unaccredited and now considered by supposed experts to be a diploma mill out of Hong Kong.
Several of these supposed experts in distance education had their own universities in operation, which are now considered degree mills, LIAR, Greenwich, Columbia Pacific and others etc... I don't need to mention any names here. What gives anyone the right to pass judgment on another individual or tell them what to do.
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion and for your assistance and in cutting these people off at the knees. Have a Nice Day!!
Sincerely,
Reverend Dr. Robert Ray Hill
aka True Patriot
I would like to mount a compaign against supposed distance learning experts and forums that allow individuals to post negative information that embarasses, defames or insults people because of the university they attended. You may contact me at RobertHill20@yahoo.com.
Freedom of Speech does not give someone the right to malign the character of another individual. We must make a stand now, or eventually, we will lose the right to decide. I believe that eventually there will be a test case in either Oregon, Maine, Texas, Washington State or any other for that matter which will overturn the laws created to prevent someone from using their unaccredited degree.
I wish to point out here that I don't condone the purchase or sale of a transcript or degree purely for the exchange of financial consideration. Work should be required. Evaluation of experiential learning is a hot topic for many people, and as long as the institution is legitimately licensed, no one should have the right to say anything.
Accreditation has always been a voluntary process. Please click on the Google link listed below and read many of the states from government websites, both state and federal. I believe with passing of the Higher Education Act of 1965, accreditation became emphasized as a means to insure quality in education.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=na...+education
http://www.chea.org/pdf/CHEA%20At%20A%20...-10-03.pdf
"CHEA Purposes ____________________________________________________________
Advocacy
• Primary national voice for voluntary accreditation"
In 1985, I borrowed close to $6,000.00 from the Federal Student Loan Program for the purpose of attending Clayton University, formally of Missouri, unaccredited and now considered by supposed experts to be a diploma mill out of Hong Kong.
Several of these supposed experts in distance education had their own universities in operation, which are now considered degree mills, LIAR, Greenwich, Columbia Pacific and others etc... I don't need to mention any names here. What gives anyone the right to pass judgment on another individual or tell them what to do.
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion and for your assistance and in cutting these people off at the knees. Have a Nice Day!!
Sincerely,
Reverend Dr. Robert Ray Hill
aka True Patriot