Jew Joke From O's Security Advisor
#21
ham Wrote:They play the race card on the old hag...a lebanese...probably an Arab family that still spawns suicide bombers...how can we even listen to what such people are saying? They're obviously biased...
On the other hand, an Ashkenazi family name is a quality certificate...only pure, unadulterated truth with no bias.
I'll leave them debate with the fine people at
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
http://www.nkusa.org/


Now where did dr. Sand get this notion of invented communities? Probably from one of the 999 marxist/left wing theories constructed to castrate gentile nationalism. What's good for the goose must be good for the gander, eh?

The theory of Khazarian origin of Ashkenazi Jews flies in the face of over 2,000 years of historical record of Jews in Europe of Middle Eastern origin. While the written record may have gaps, it would be a fair assumption that a Jewish population in a location in say 800 AD would be descended from a Jewish population in the same area 400 years earlier. I don't think anyone denies that there couldn't be a Khazari element in Jewish populations of Eastern Europe. A hint of the Ashkenazi's intermediate origin is that they spoke Yiddish, a German dialect.
Reply
#22
Quote:The theory of Khazarian origin of Ashkenazi Jews flies in the face of over 2,000 years of historical record of Jews in Europe of Middle Eastern origin. While the written record may have gaps, it would be a fair assumption that a Jewish population in a location in say 800 AD would be descended from a Jewish population in the same area 400 years earlier. I don't think anyone denies that there couldn't be a Khazari element in Jewish populations of Eastern Europe. A hint of the Ashkenazi's intermediate origin is that they spoke Yiddish, a German dialect.


That does not hold water.
If it held water, Saddam had a right title to claim Mesopotamia back...after all, aren't ruins of ancient mesopotamian empires in Irak?
Or Mussolini had a rightful claim to all the territory of the ancient Roman empire...isn't there enough archaeological, fossil, linguistic you name it evidence to support his claim? Hey! After all, Rome is in Italy and who lives in Rome? Romans do...therefore Italy shall rule from Britannia to Egypt again...

In the middle ages, Charlemagne re-founded a Roman Empire in Europe, but he was as Roman as you are...zero %. In Italy as well, you won't find any 'Roman' blood...Arabs, Albanians, Levantines [those who look like philipinos today] in the south, Germanic invaders and Asian tribes (Avars etc) in the north.
Why would this logic escape to or not apply to Jews escapes me.

The French-speaking community in Quebec and NB integrated many Scottish or Irish elements, who may now or then have considered themselves Canadiens-francais.

Quote:I think of this ‘universalisation’ of the Jewish phenomenon and its integration into mainstream European
consciousness, this emergence of a ‘Judaising terrain’ and ‘Judaising milieu’ in all their widely varied, conscious
and unconscious manifestations, as a ‘filling’ of the Jewish space which encompasses the creation of a ‘Virtual
Jewishness’, a ‘Virtual Jewish World’ by non-Jews – ‘Virtual Jews’.
It is they who, in the absence of significant Jewish populations create a sort of parallel universe by
performing or taking over cultural and other activities which would ordinarily be carried out by Jews. (There are
about 35,000 known Jews in Italy; 5,000–20,000 in Poland; 4,000 in Slovakia; 10,000 in Austria. Thanks to
immigrants from the former Soviet Union, the Jewish population in Germany has doubled in the 1990s to
100,000.) Some non-Jews go so far as to wear stars of David around their necks, assume Jewish-sounding
names, attend synagogue, send their children to Jewish schools, establish twin cities relationships with Israeli
towns, in addition to championing Jewish causes.
http://books.google.it/books?id=ULYXVHAt...&q&f=false

The people in the red quote will probably be telling their children of their illustrious family back from the time of Solomon.
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#23
ham Wrote:That does not hold water.
If it held water, Saddam had a right title to claim Mesopotamia back...after all, aren't ruins of ancient mesopotamian empires in Irak?
Or Mussolini had a rightful claim to all the territory of the ancient Roman empire...isn't there enough archaeological, fossil, linguistic you name it evidence to support his claim? Hey! After all, Rome is in Italy and who lives in Rome? Romans do...therefore Italy shall rule from Britannia to Egypt again...

The French-speaking community in Quebec and NB integrated many Scottish or Irish elements, who may now or then have considered themselves Canadiens-francais.

I don't think ancient origin gives anyone claim to anything. The Jews are presently in Israel. That is a legitimate claim. DNA evidence seems to indicate a middle east origin other than a whole whack of Ashkenazi Jews seem to descend from 4 European women.

I've always wondered how French-Canadians with Irish or Scottish names prevent being mistaken for Anglos and treated like dog crap. Does anyone actually read their resumes.
Reply
#24
You are mixing 'Jews' are religion and 'Jews' as presumed ethnic group still surviving intact after 3000 years...face it, no other group is. You have Christians everywhere...but they have no link soever to whatever semites opened the shop in AD 30. Even Greek culture in central Asia (kingdoms founded by Alexander's heirs) did not survive. Invading tribes from the depth of Asia replaced Hellenic people but kept the cultural infrastructure almost intact: Graeco-buddhism still flourished incorporating elements of Zoroastrianism etc.
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#25
Reply
#26
Let's hope the KKK won't run away with the fact that some miss GELLER (Remember Uri, the famed Israeli who could bend spoons with his mind?) is accusing mr. Soetoro of being an antisemite or whatever name they call those who don't toe the line of certain interests...
It is funny to remember how different the party line was when mr. Soetoro serenaded AIPAC with what many termed servility unrivaled in decades...the Muslim elephant had been in the room all the time, but at that time mr. Shamboim, dr. Swinestein and rep. Sam Priest (born Shmuel Cohen ) all said it was closeted Nazis and racist bigots picking nits about Barry's multicolored past, and twisting it to hamper that great step forward for mankind...boy...the least you can say is that some people's opinion are very negotiable...
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#27
Following up on the original story--James "Jew Joke" Jones is out, to be replaced by anti-military political hack Tom Donilon, ironically described as a "bad joke" himself.

Quote:James Jones Out, Anti-Military Guy In
October 8, 2010 Posted by John at 8:03 PM

The news is coming so thick and fast these days one can hardly keep up with it, let alone comment intelligently. But we should at least note that Marine General Jim Jones resigned as President Obama's National Security Adviser today, and will be replaced by political operative Tom Donilon.

It is hard to remember now, but shortly after his election, Obama's selection of Gen. Jones as national security adviser, along with a handful of similar appointments, caused us and other observers who are even more knowledgeable to hail what seemed to be a reassuringly moderate trend in Obama's nascent foreign policy. Those days are long gone now, and it seems that Jones never had much influence. Reuters reports that Jones was "often portrayed as an outsider who struggled to make his voice heard over Obama's close-knit group of advisers who were with him on his 2008 election campaign."

Donilon is cut from a different cloth:

Quote:In veteran U.S. journalist Bob Woodward's new book "Obama's Wars," which gives an inside look at how Obama crafted his Afghan war strategy, Donilon is shown as deeply skeptical of a big troop increase in Afghanistan.

In other words, he agrees with the President. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told Woodward that it would be a "disaster" if Donilon were to become National Security Adviser, but Gates now says he has a "good working relationship" with Donilon, "contrary to what you may have read." That seems like less than a recantation.

Andy McCarthy, meanwhile, skewers the New York Times' characterization of Donilon as a "non-ideological pragmatist." Of course, to the Times, Paul Krugman is a non-ideological pragmatist. Andy notes that Donilon's boss, General Jones, like Gates, has reservations about him:

Quote:Jones echoed criticisms that Donilon lacked critical national security experience and existed in a lawyer's bunker, his power stemming from his status as a Democratic fixer who has the president's ear -- an ear Donilon routinely fills with "snap judgments" and "absolute declarations" about places he's never been to, foreign officials he's never met, and a military with which he has no credibility.

Donilon's appointment is one more sign that President Obama is abandoning any pretense of moderation, and is instead lurching to the left, surrounding himself with people with whom he is comfortable--Democratic Party political operatives--rather than those with whom he is not comfortable, like military men.

PAUL adds: Donilon actually is a pragmatist, though not a particularly non-ideological one. That's another way of saying that he's a thorough-going political animal.

There's a place for that species in every administration, but the place isn't National Security Adviser. By putting Donilon in that post, instead of, say, chief of staff where it was rumored he might end up, the president confirms that, for him, national security is subservient to politics. Of course, the formulation of the administration's Afghanistan policy, and the polilcy itself, had already demonstrated this.

UPDATE: More on Donilon's background. If you wondered whether my description of him as a political operative was fair, read on:

Quote:For a long time, Donilon lived his life from presidential campaign to campaign.

The Democratic operative worked on his first Democratic National Convention at 24, and he's been helping elect candidates ever since. He has worked for Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Joseph R. Biden. ...

He was a registered lobbyist from 1999 through 2005, and his sole client was Fannie Mae. ... His brother is Michael C. Donilon, a counselor to Vice President Joseph R. Biden. His wife, Cathy Russell, is Jill Biden's chief of staff.

Yes, and now he is President Obama's National Security Adviser. This would be a bad joke, except...it isn't a joke.

Reply
#28
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)