| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 96 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 94 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu
|
| Latest Threads |
Accreditation Racket
Forum: Unaccredited vs. State-Approved vs. Accredited
Last Post: WilliamW
06-03-2026, 01:14 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 839
|
UIUC Flushes Gollin Crime...
Forum: George Gollin
Last Post: Dickie Billericay
05-21-2026, 04:58 PM
» Replies: 26
» Views: 17,292
|
Universities Offer Up Cou...
Forum: Unaccredited vs. State-Approved vs. Accredited
Last Post: Herbert Spencer
05-15-2026, 11:59 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 847
|
A Kick in the Shorts for ...
Forum: John Bear
Last Post: Martin Eisenstadt
05-10-2026, 08:00 AM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 68,023
|
DesElms Skulking in Yonde...
Forum: Gregg DesElms
Last Post: WilliamW
01-17-2026, 11:53 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 2,924
|
Brown U Shooter Physics M...
Forum: George Gollin
Last Post: WilliamW
12-22-2025, 03:50 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,111
|
MD Gov's 'Missing' Thesis...
Forum: General Education Discussions
Last Post: Armando Ramos
12-13-2025, 08:47 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,401
|
UCumberlands' H1B Scam
Forum: Distance Learning Discussion
Last Post: Harrison J Bounel
12-02-2025, 12:38 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,139
|
Levicoff Snuffs It
Forum: Nominees, second-stringers, others
Last Post: Albert Hidel
11-09-2025, 04:16 PM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 13,291
|
The College Scam: New Boo...
Forum: General Education Discussions
Last Post: Henry Greenberg
09-14-2025, 03:42 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 8,677
|
|
|
| College Dangerous for Men |
|
Posted by: Armando Ramos - 09-13-2011, 05:35 PM - Forum: General Education Discussions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
A good reason to take those classes online, guys.
Quote:Phyllis Schlafly
College May Be Dangerous for Men
9/13/2011
College is a dangerous place for men. They are not only a minority, but they are victimized by discriminatory and unconstitutional anti-male rules.
In another striking proof that the Obama administration is totally manipulated by feminists, the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights sent out a 19-page "DCL" (Dear Colleague Letter) to colleges and universities that should make men fear attending college at all. The letter adopts the feminist theory that in all sexual controversies or accusations, the man is guilty unless he proves himself innocent.
This DCL carries the force of law, since it purports to be an additional implementation of Title IX, the 1972 federal law that bans sex discrimination in educational institutions that receive federal assistance. But the DCL was never legislated by Congress, and it was not even launched as a regulation that requires posting for comment in the Federal Register.
The DCL is just a federal order, issued by a feminist bureaucrat named Russlynn Ali, which colleges and universities must obey under threat of losing their funding. Colleges have dutifully fallen in line by spelling it out in their fall orientations under the rubric of making campuses friendly to women and requiring sensitivity about offensive words and ideas.
The most unconstitutional part of Ali's impertinent DCL is that it orders colleges to reject use of the criminal justice standard of proof. The DCL rules that an accused man doesn't have to be judged guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt," or even the intermediate standard of "clear and convincing" proof.
Instead, Ms. Ali instructs colleges that they must judge an accused man based on "a preponderance of the evidence" standard. That means the campus disciplinary board (which may include feminist faculty from the Women's Studies Department) only has to believe that the female accuser is 51 percent likely to be truthful and accurate.
Furthermore, the DCL "strongly discourages" colleges from permitting an accused man "to question or cross-examine the accuser" during the hearing. And appeals must be available to both parties, which subjects the guy to double jeopardy.
The punishment of a man convicted under these DCL rules will far exceed what the campus disciplinary committee may hand out. He will likely be expelled, barred from graduate or professional school and some government jobs, suffer irreparable damage to his reputation, and possibly be exposed to criminal prosecution.
The feminist apparatus is constantly grinding out phony statistics about sexual assault and harassment, accusations that men are naturally batterers, and that women never lie or make errors in sexual allegations. The feminists are unrepentant about the way they and the prosecutors (toadying to the feminists) accepted and publicized lies that destroyed the reputations of the Duke lacrosse men and of Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Another monster that hangs over the heads of college students is the increasing evidence that college is a bad financial investment that will saddle students with debt they can never escape. Pro-college ads from organizations like How To E-D-U and KnowHow2Go are seductive: "College graduates can make a million dollars more in their lifetimes than those who don't go to college."
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS, 17 million college-educated Americans are now working jobs for which they are overqualified. The BLS reports that hundreds of thousands of college graduates are working as waiters, secretaries, receptionists, laborers or janitors, all respectable occupations but not jobs that will enable them to repay their five- or even six-digit college loans.
The current student loan debt, now $830 billion, is bigger than credit-card debt and growing at the rate of $90 billion a year. Only 40 percent of that debt is actively being repaid, and students are not permitted to escape that debt burden through bankruptcy, so we may be headed for a student-loan bubble like the housing bubble.
The one project that received an increased appropriation in the bipartisan deal to raise the debt ceiling was more money to subsidize students to go to college. Loaning taxpayers' money to students to go to college makes no sense and is hurtful even to the students who get the money.
If students were working a 48-hour-a-week night job, as I did when I worked my way through college, they wouldn't have time to get into the mischief referenced by the recent DCL or to attend drinking parties, and they wouldn't accumulate the indebtedness that will burden their lives for decades.
For encouragement, they can read Zac Bissonnette's helpful book, "Debt-Free U: How I Paid for an Outstanding College Education Without Loans, Scholarships, or Mooching Off My Parents." Alternatively, students can get a job that doesn't require a college education.
|
|
|
| BUSTED! Inside "The Gang" Stalker Conspiracy |
|
Posted by: Administrator - 09-11-2011, 07:33 AM - Forum: BUSTED! Inside "The Gang" Stalker Conspiracy
- Replies (8)
|
 |
This is (or soon will be) the complete list and available content of posts made on a formerly "secret" Degreediscussion.com forum they call "The Gang." This information was provided to us by a confidential informant and is believed to be reliable. It is reproduced here as a public service and is not intended in any way as an endorsement of the sordid individuals involved or their dissolute conduct.
Names have been redacted in some instances to protect the privacy of the subject, or to avoid perpetuating lies or slander contained in the original post. Many of the posts are just idle, baseless speculation on the identity of various posters here. Since we don't allow those kinds of posts on our forum, obviously we don't want to be doing their dirty work for them. If your name is mentioned by the stalking crew in these posts and you would prefer that it not be included, let us know and we'll see what we can do.
Aside from numbering the posts for reference (generally the lower the number, the more recent the post), these are otherwise the actual posts as made by the stalkers comprising "The Gang."
Rather than make you wait until all the docs are scrutinized by law enforcement and legal authorities, we are posting them as they become available. Check back frequently as they will be trickling out slowly in the coming weeks.
|
|
|
|